<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Flint, School District of the City of - EdTribune MI - Michigan Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Flint, School District of the City of. Data-driven education journalism for Michigan. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://mi.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Michigan’s 84.0% Graduation Rate Spanned a Wide Range of District Reports</title><link>https://mi.edtribune.com/mi/2026-10-13-mi-districts-below-70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://mi.edtribune.com/mi/2026-10-13-mi-districts-below-70/</guid><description>Michigan&apos;s four-year graduation rate reached 84.0% for the Class of 2025, the highest statewide rate in the available reporting panel from 2007 through 2025. The statewide improvement sits alongside a...</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Michigan&apos;s four-year graduation rate reached 84.0% for the Class of 2025, the highest statewide rate in the available reporting panel from 2007 through 2025. The statewide improvement sits alongside a broad range of district-level outcomes. Among 645 district reports with a published rate, 110 reached at least 95%, while 97 were below 70%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those counts describe reports, rather than the share of Michigan students in each group. Each district report gets one observation in this comparison, while the published statewide rate measures the state&apos;s graduating cohort. A distribution of district rates cannot replace that statewide measure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/img/2026-10-13-mi-districts-below-70-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Michigan&apos;s published statewide graduation rate&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The statewide result and local outcomes answer different questions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state&apos;s rate rose from 82.8% for the Class of 2024 to 84.0% for the Class of 2025, an increase of 1.2 percentage points. The earliest statewide observation in this panel, for the Class of 2007, was 75.5%. The historical comparison is limited to the available panel; it does not establish an all-time record before that window.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Named district reports show how different an outcome can look within the statewide result. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/districts/troy&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Troy School District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 98.3% for the Class of 2025. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/districts/plymouthcanton&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Plymouth-Canton Community Schools&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 93.3%, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/districts/flint-of-the-city-of&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Flint, School District of the City of&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 52.3%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are separate cohort rates, not a comparison of individual students&apos; chances after accounting for their circumstances. The figures do not establish why a district&apos;s rate differs from the state or how a particular program affected it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/img/2026-10-13-mi-districts-below-70-bottom15.png&quot; alt=&quot;Three named district graduation reports&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Threshold counts need precise language&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The high-rate count uses “at least 95%,” including a report at exactly that boundary. If the comparison instead uses “above 95%,” the count is 109. That distinction is small in size but necessary for stating what the published reports support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the other end, the 97 reports below 70% are defined by a strict cutoff. These thresholds were chosen to describe the distribution. They are not evidence that Michigan has two distinct education systems, and they do not identify the governance or student populations behind the rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The distribution includes every finite published district-level all-students rate in the latest reporting year. Eighteen other district reports lacked a usable published rate and are excluded. Their outcomes are unknown in this comparison, rather than treated as zero or grouped with the low-rate reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/img/2026-10-13-mi-districts-below-70-distribution.png&quot; alt=&quot;Distribution of published district-level graduation rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A wide range is not a cause&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;https://mischooldata.org/graddropout-rate/&quot;&gt;Michigan Center for Educational Performance and Information&apos;s graduation reporting&lt;/a&gt; supplies published outcomes and cohort definitions. The data used here does not provide the consistent charter, virtual-program or geographic fields needed to explain the distribution by those categories. A name that sounds like an academy or a rural place is not a substitute for such a field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nor does a lower four-year graduation rate mean that every other student dropped out. Students can have other recorded outcomes, and this comparison does not assign destinations or subsequent graduation to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide high and the local range can both be true. Michigan improved at the statewide level, while some district reports remained well below it. The next reporting task is to understand those named cohort outcomes from local evidence, without converting a threshold or a district name into an explanation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>Michigan&apos;s Black-white Graduation Gap Reached an 11-Point Low</title><link>https://mi.edtribune.com/mi/2026-09-11-mi-black-white-gap-halved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://mi.edtribune.com/mi/2026-09-11-mi-black-white-gap-halved/</guid><description>Correction: This article was rebuilt before publication to restore omitted reporting years, correct cohort arithmetic, and remove unsupported explanations.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Correction: This article was rebuilt before publication to restore omitted reporting years, correct cohort arithmetic, and remove unsupported explanations.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michigan&apos;s four-year graduation rate for Black students rose from 56.4% in 2007 to 75.7% in 2025. Over the same period, the rate for white students rose from 81.6% to 86.7%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That changed the distance between the two rates from 25.1 percentage points to 11.0. The 14.1-point reduction narrowed the gap by 56.1%, and the latest gap is the smallest in the complete 19-reporting-year race panel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both student groups improved. The Black rate gained 19.3 points while the white rate gained 5.2. Michigan&apos;s remaining disparity is smaller because the Black rate rose faster, not because the white rate fell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/img/2026-09-11-mi-black-white-gap-halved-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Michigan&apos;s Black graduation rate rose faster than the white rate from 2007 through 2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A setback, then four annual gains&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The long-run change was not smooth. The Black graduation rate reached 70.4% in 2020, then fell 2.8 points to 67.6% in 2021. It rose in each of the next four reporting years and reached 75.7% in 2025, an 8.1-point gain from the 2021 low.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gap widened from 15.1 points in 2020 to 16.5 in 2021. It then narrowed by 5.5 points through 2025. That latest result is both the highest Black graduation rate and the smallest Black-white gap in the panel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/img/2026-09-11-mi-black-white-gap-halved-gap.png&quot; alt=&quot;Michigan&apos;s Black-white graduation gap reached 11.0 percentage points in 2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;One state rate, sharply different local results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide average does not describe every district. For a comparison with less volatility from very small cohorts, this analysis used an editorial cutoff of at least 100 Black students in a district&apos;s reported 2025 cohort. That produced 53 districts covering 12,669 of the statewide Black cohort&apos;s 19,821 students, or 63.9%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thirty of those 53 districts met or exceeded the statewide Black graduation rate of 75.7%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/districts/detroit-82015&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Detroit Public Schools Community District&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 83.5% for a Black cohort of 2,775 students. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/districts/saginaw-of-the-city-of&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Saginaw, School District of the City of&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 84.6% for 240 students. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/districts/flint-of-the-city-of&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Flint, School District of the City of&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 54.0% for 139 students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The cutoff is an editorial comparison rule, not a state classification. At lower thresholds, more districts enter the comparison, but their smaller cohorts make a one-student change matter more to the rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/mi/img/2026-09-11-mi-black-white-gap-halved-comparison.png&quot; alt=&quot;Michigan district Black graduation rates varied widely in 2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What the rates establish&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Direct evidence:&lt;/strong&gt; Michigan&apos;s Black-white graduation gap narrowed substantially across the available panel, and the 2025 Black rate was the panel&apos;s highest. The district records also show that statewide progress was uneven.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Competing explanation:&lt;/strong&gt; Differences among districts may reflect local programs, student mobility, cohort composition or reporting practices. The graduation records do not separate those possibilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unresourced:&lt;/strong&gt; The data cannot identify a single intervention that caused the statewide change. Claims about curriculum, credit recovery or support programs would require evidence beyond these rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2025 result carries both parts of Michigan&apos;s graduation story. The Black graduation rate is higher than in any other year in the panel, while 11.0 percentage points still separate it from the white rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Graduation-rate data comes from the official &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mischooldata.org/graddropout-rate?Common_Locations=1-A&quot;&gt;Michigan Department of Education&apos;s MI School Data Grad/Dropout Rate report&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This analysis uses state and district records covering 2007 through 2025. The trend uses the complete race-subgroup panel; the package&apos;s statewide all-students row is absent for 2021 through 2023, but the race rows are present and reconcile exactly in every year where the all-students row is available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>